🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of states are considering similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban is "one of the tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged lawmakers to approve a proposal lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a useful first step," commented one MEP supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "based on strong research".

Previously, interest built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation established by the family of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, regulation is primarily happening at the state government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further time needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills demanding guardian approval for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some figures to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more cautious tone. Unicef has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The agency notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this global debate evolves, the policies of Australia and others show that states internationally are no longer prepared to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.